Talk:National Fraud Authority

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Action Fraud causes email account suspension?[edit]

I forwarded some scam e-mails to Action Fraud and my e-mail provider labelled me a scammer and suspended my account. This is not the best way to encourage public co-operation in combatting fraud. Biscuittin (talk) 10:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you're upset, but is this confirmable? The actions of one hyper-active email provider may not warrant such a damning comment in the Wikipedia article.OrbiterSpacethingy (talk) 14:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also sympathise but Wikipedia entries are required to be based on verifiable published sources, not on a single, possibly untypical, incident. I have forwarded dozens of emails to Action Fraud without any problem RichWA (talk) 08:29, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I removed the section and kept in a little bit about the email forwarding. If the claims can be verified, here's the removed part:

"It is also possible to forward scam e-mails to Action Fraud but this is inadvisable. Action Fraud warns that forwarders may receive "bounce back" messages. What is does not warn is that forwarders may be labelled scammers by their own e-mail providers and may have their e-mail accounts suspended."

OrbiterSpacethingy (talk) 15:00, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revisions have resulted in loss of information[edit]

See the text of the article by the original author here. James500 (talk) 05:03, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Annual Fraud Indicator[edit]

The former text of the section in the article fraud had the cost at £38 billion, not £30 billion. Which is correct? James500 (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Fraud Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120919224137/http://homeoffice.gov.uk/agencies-public-bodies/ to http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/agencies-public-bodies/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]