Talk:National Pacemaker Awards

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History[edit]

I am a retired high school journalism adviser. When I was executive director of Oregon's scholastic press association in 2010, I went through NSPA's online records and added Oregon schools that were award winners to the list with the citation at the time. Today I checked up on the source citation problem cited at the top and discovered that NSPA has completely changed its website, and they now feature only the last four years of winners on a drop-down menu. The rest of the history is gone. This wikipedia entry is now the only record on the web of the achievements of these student publications. Unless there is a local media link to a news article -- unlikely for many older entries -- there is no longer and authoritative source for this information. Robmelt (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chances are the only people coming to this page found it by way of National Newspaper Pacemaker Award, so it may as well be merged. It would most likely be useful information to anyone looking at that page. JoelC 22:54, 30 March 2006 (UTC)JoelC[reply]

By "this page" I actually meant List of National Newspaper Pacemaker winners. Unless someone wants to bother adding all the winners from the NPSA website to that page, it could be included in this one. JoelC 22:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)JoelC[reply]

Agree. Abtract 16:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major merge/new article needed[edit]

As I mentioned on the List of National Newspaper Pacemake Award Recipients article, the Newspaper Pacemaker award is one type of Pacemaker award offered by the NSPA - other being Online, Broadcast, and Yearbook/Magazine. Shouldn't this particular article be merged as a section in a general NSPA Pacemaker Award article? This article seems to suggest that the Newspaper Pacemaker is the ONLY Pacemaker awarded by NSPA. Aphrodite7717 16:40, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about whether THIS article should be merged, but I did merge the list of national newspaper pacemaker winners into this article, as it was put up for merger back in February and no one voiced any problems with it. -Warhorus 07:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move/new article created![edit]

I decided to follow general Wikipedia advice to be bold, and I moved/renamed "National Newspaper Pacemaker Award" to "NSPA Pacemaker Award" so that the newspaper category can be incorporated in a more general Pacemaker Award page that also incorporates Yearbook/Magazine, Online, and Broadcast.

I included the link to the Newspaper Pacemaker winners under the Newspaper section. I know there was talk about incporating that page into this one; I will leave that up to a future merge.

There is now room to begin listing some more information under the other Pacemaker categories (Yearbook/Magazine winners, etc.) But what does anyone think about expanding the Newspaper winners page to make it one big winners-in-all-categories page? I know that Aurora is already listed on the newspaper winners page although it is, in fact, a Yearbook winner.

Thoughts? Aphrodite7717 17:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was WP:BOLD in moving it to "National Pacemaker Awards to encompass the fact that the award is given out by two groups - the NSPA and the ACP. Thus there is an "NSPA Pacemaker" and an "ACP Pacemaker" - this title represents both. FCYTravis 21:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tidbits[edit]

Added a "tidbits" section for interesting random facts, and brought back an ealier reference to the only two schools to win both a Newspaper and Online packemaker. Feel free to change the name and format of this section. Aphrodite7717 17:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it becuase the HiLite and the Lakewood Times also have won both. Perhaps more. As the list grows, the information isn't very interesting. 68.184.209.190 04:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on National Pacemaker Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:38, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Pacemaker Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]