Talk:National Recovery Administration

United States: Government Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problem[edit]

This: "About 23,000,000 people worked under the NRA fair code. However, violations of codes became common and attempts were made to use the courts to enforce the NRA." is verbatim from this page: [1].— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.27.59.173 (talk) 05:49, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to say that. This page lacks detail AND the detail it has is copied! 75.45.224.208 (talk) 01:48, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Link[edit]

This doesn't go to the right place:

The Bird Did Its Part by T.H. Watkins— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.27.59.173 (talk) 05:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FTFY: Archive of [http://web.archive.org/web/20060105004555/http://www.smithsonianmag.si.edu/smithsonian/issues99/may99/object_may99.html The Bird Did Its Part].
-- 12.218.76.10 (talk) 11:58, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Year set up[edit]

can you please say what year it was set up— Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.209.170.54 (talk) 12:03, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bias[edit]

This article is negative in tone. There are plenty of references to the NRA being statist/fascist, and references to economically conservative sources criticizing the NRA, but there is no counterpoint praise from the stand point of the pro-labor camp, etc. This counterpoint must be added to make this a credible article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.245.165.13 (talk) 19:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user at IP96.245.165.13: I just ran a quick search, and there are no references in the article at all to the NRA being "statist/fascist." Those terms do not even appear in the article. Please clarify. Famspear (talk) 19:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I need to correct myself. There are some mentions of the word "fascism." I had searched only for "fascist." Famspear (talk) 19:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

not enough info[edit]

This phrase "Jack Magid was jailed for violating the "Tailor's Code" by pressing a suit for 35 rather than NRA required 40 cents." has no reference and needs to be qualified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.254.115.230 (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Maged wasn't simply fined for not going along with the NRA, he was put in jail and fined. Major difference that needs correcting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.29.110.225 (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC) Source: "tugwell Vs Maged, NY Herald Tribune 4/23/1934; Jailing of Tailor Called Necessary, no date, Borah Papers LC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.29.110.225 (talk) 17:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Armour[edit]

I previously deleted the "Satire" section because it contained only a reference to a comment by Richard Armour and did not appear notable to the subject of the article. I was quickly reverted by another editor so I'm adding a tag the article in the hopes that someone can either show how it is notable, or build some consensus to simply remove it. My basic premise is that Armour's comment is no way relevant to the article and basically amounts to trivia. CarbonX (talk) 23:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

if Armour had written a book or short story on NRA then it's notable, but not a one liner that never got picked up by anyone else. Rjensen (talk) 01:26, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Destructive competition"?[edit]

The article uses, but does not define, the phrase "destructive competition."

Probably because a sensible definition does not exist. When firms compete for business on the basis of lower prices or higher quality, there are myriad benefits to consumers, and no drawbacks.

The only possible way that competition could be considered "destructive" is that it forces inefficient firms to either become more efficient, or stop operating. But that too is a good thing. 50.198.139.201 (talk) 16:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Recovery Administration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Blue Eagle[edit]

While the Blue Eagle article has some decent sources, all but a few sentences of prose are redundant to the National Recovery Administration article. Suggest it become a section of said article. p b p 14:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

good idea. Rjensen (talk) 14:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done p b p 05:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: History on the Web[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 March 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ghuttinger (article contribs).

Both student Ghuttinger and professor Jannekenls have made substantial edits to the Blue Eagle section of the article, fleshing out details for what the logo meant to consumers and how both businesses and consumers used it. — Preceding undated comment added 14:48, 6 May 2022 (UTC)