Talk:National Space Centre

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dubious opening line[edit]

"The National Space Centre is the UK's only visitor attraction devoted to space science and astronomy." London Planetarium is no longer in the UK, then? Grutness...wha? 12:09, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  The London Planetarium has now closed. Madame Tussaud's will be showing shows 
  about celebrities in it, instead.--217.33.55.196 10:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's a great venue but you're right - not the only one dedicated to the subject. I have proposed a qualified opening line Infilms 10:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advert banner[edit]

I have removed most of the material that seems to be cut from brochures and tourism websites. Can we remove the {{advert}} banner from the top now? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 23:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that's a lot better than it was. _TheIslander 11:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Building Height[edit]

The tower's height is 42 metres. I think it belongs on the Main Page but I need other facts on this. The text may need to be edited into a different form of sentance, but not deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by James Emtage (talk • contribs) 16:41, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Space Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131119115206/http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Doctor-fans-meet-stars-villains-National-Space/story-20090129-detail/story.html to http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/doctor-fans-meet-stars-villains-national-space/story-20090129-detail/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]