This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
I'm tempted to decline this. The nomination criteria: "This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion as an article that contains no content whatsoever, or consists only of external links, category tags, a "see also" section, a rephrasing of the title, an attempt to correspond with the person or group named by its title, chat-like comments and/or images." It -has- content. Minimal content, but it has content. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 18:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
10 words and a a dozen of links and that makes it a stub? Let's take this to the AfD discussion anyway. --JokerXtreme (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, agree. To be honest, as-is this article isn't doing anything, and I just submitted a neutral stance to the AfD because I could really go either way. But the 10 words at issue do push this past an A3, in my opinion. The article would literally need to be empty of anything but "See Also's," in this case, to be an A3 candidate. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 19:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
