Talk:Nea Salamis Famagusta/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: EricEnfermero (talk · contribs) 08:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing this. More comments shortly. EricEnfermero (Talk) 08:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, looking at the prose, this entry's grammar is a long way from GA standards. I attempted some copyediting, but there are places where I cannot determine what the author is trying to say. The first part of the article wasn't so bad, but the issues got worse around the Football section.

Here are some examples of the problems, beginning at the Football section:

"The team claimed unsuccessfully four times to win the championship, finishing all four times in the third position. Participated in a total of three cup finals."
"The championship began with consecutive wins and claimed the championship with claims."
"In the away game with APOEL to GSP Nea Salamina preceded by 3–0. In the 62' minute a player of APOEL hit a player of Nea Salamina and a member of APOEL grabbed the flag of assistant referee and extinction."
"The court of CFA decided repeat of the match, ignoring that for the interruption was responsible player and agent for the home team."
"The same position occupied in 1981 and 1983. In 1981 lost the championship to the difference set."
"first, girls to deal with volleyball and second to maintain the entity of the club"
"Indeed, the season 1981–82 had runners on first place with the AEL, but lacked in the proportion of sets in just two sets."

Those are at least some of the examples. It looks like previous peer review requests have not generated any feedback, but I would recommend a copyediting request at WP:GOCE. The article has a great level of detail and is robustly sourced, but the language is just not ready for GA at this point. Thanks for understanding. EricEnfermero (Talk) 08:54, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]