Talk:Nekketsu Saikyō Go-Saurer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Actual spelling of show name...[edit]

Need confirmation that the romanized name of this show is officially spelled "Gozaurer" and not "Gosaurer"; So far, I have only seen "Gosaurer" in material as the official name. (Heck, even the name of the ED theme artists seems to point to this being the case.)

If I don't see any hard data in romanized material that this show is called "Gozaurer" within about a week (ANN—which uses straight romaji and ignores official romanizations for obscure shows a fair bit of the time—doesn't count in my view), a move proposal will be filed. Thanks. --E. Megas 19:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence against you: Exhibit A (from Tomy); Exhibit B (from Sunrise). Good luck! --E. Megas 20:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. Now that I've seen most of the material, the proper romanization looks to be "Go-Saurer," with a hyphen. Well, I suppose I got it half-right all this time... --E. Megas 22:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All right, time's up. See below. --E. Megas 07:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am addicted to Nekketsu Saikyo Gozaurer

Umm. Sure. What does that have to do with anything? --E. Megas 17:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. Andrewa 12:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

Nekketsu Saikyo GozaurerNekketsu Saikyo Go-Saurer — Proper English romanization as per relevant evidence from the show's studio, Sunrise. E. Megas 07:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move[edit]

  1. Support per nom. John Smith's 15:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey - in opposition to the move[edit]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.