Talk:Nepal at the 2010 Winter Olympics

Nepal at the 2010 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 15, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
January 20, 2024	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nepal at the 2010 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 20:59, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Nepal firs participated"
Mention the day of the event that Sherpa participated in.

That's it. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 20:59, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Handled. Thanks for the review! Courcelles (talk) 21:05, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot to ping Nova Crystallis. Courcelles (talk) 21:07, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

Nepal at the 2010 Winter Olympics[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Not delisting, no consensus to delist GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 14:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

201 words for a GA, with a uncited sentence. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 08:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no uncited material and length is not a GA criterion; nominator has been requested to think before opening four reassessments with the same invalid reasoning. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.