Talk:NetFront

NPOV[edit]

This article is pratically an advertisement:

"NetFront supports almost any popular OS or CPU in the beyond-PC world, while offering low power consumption, easy customization and a broad range of plug-ins." Or: "NetFront is small in footprint, yet loaded with features. Its compact code size is ideally suited for embedded applications such as real-time cellular telephony, while still supporting desktop-like Web browsing capabilities."

I mean, really. Such gushing praise needs some real world provisos or at least specific evidence and citations to support such sterling features. --maru (talk) Contribs 07:12, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i agree it needs to be changed, but do not delete it, it is providing useful information that just needs to be re-written.

I’ve just viewed my own website in NetFront (PlayStation browser). Oh my god, it’s less standards-compliant than IE 6. Train wreck. — Chameleon 06:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ScreenShot[edit]

I have posted a screenshot of the browser in full screen mode on a Nokia Ngage. If a "normal mode" image would be better, please let me know.

Whiz —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Whizkiddreloaded (talk • contribs) 06:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

In screenshots of this, could someone provide a screenshot of it rendering Wikipedia? It gives a better idea of what it is like, nearly every browser shot here is for the Wikipedia homepage.

AJAX[edit]

Wouldn't it be better to actually say what scriptign it supports, then to say it supports AJAX? Does it support Javascript, WMLScript or what? Mathiastck 12:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Acid3[edit]

NetFront on PS3 scores 27/100 on the Acid3 test, should this be mentioned in the article? --90.236.98.107 (talk) 12:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.access-company.com/products/mobile_solutions/netfrontmobile/netfrontplus/index.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The oldest mobile browser of the world?[edit]

1995 doesn't fit here (not broken): [1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.41.10.227 (talk) 13:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Reference to software[edit]

Someone listed 4.5.0-10U as a version of netfront, that is actually the firmware version of the 3DS, netfront on the 3DS is netfront browser nx 1.0.66.189.173.57 (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on NetFront. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]