Talk:Network load balancing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Already covered in Load balancing (computing)[edit]

This, and links to it, probably should redirect there instead. This article is basically redundant, except for maybe some of the material on Microsoft Terminal Server/Terminal Services. I discovered this when attempting to move this to "Network load balancing" (as this is not a proper noun, therefore should not be capitalized)

-- Joe (talk) 21:37, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Network Load Balancing is Microsoft's term[edit]

pfSense calls it "Outbound Load Balancing." http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&Itemid=43

I'm not sure if this is a more vendor neutral term, or just pfSense's own term. However, from a firewall perspective, "Outbound Load Balancing" seems clearer to me.--GlenPeterson (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a medium for advertising.[edit]

"connectify" is not the only group that has a product that allows multiple connections to be used (one other would be "octopusplus"). suggest a neutral replacement, which also suggests other ways including software and hardware (eg. DD-wrt, a free firmware for routers, can be used for this purpose after configuration). Charlieb000 (talk) 00:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Network Load Balancing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140131115541/http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_example09186a0080a07203.shtml to http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_example09186a0080a07203.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]