Talk:Neural encoding of sound
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Hard slog[edit]
I've been trying to make something useful of this article, but it's hard. So much of what's there is just plain wrong, written off the top of some novice's head. Maybe it would be better to give up and start over? Dicklyon (talk) 21:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- I would rate this as Start class. If you can start over and get a result that is Start-class, I say go for it; turning it into a stub would not be appropriate though. Looie496 (talk) 22:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do rewrite it Dickylon since you have nothing better to do. The entire review process is meant to be constructive, so please have at it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.251.57 (talk) 21:10, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
The inverse frequency is called period[edit]
The graph is wrong. The problem is that it is unclear whether the x-axis denotes time or position. If the x-axis denotes time, then the distance between two local maxima is called the period, so the formula should be
period = 1/ frequency
If the x-axis denotes position, then the distance between two local maxima is called the wavelength. (The inverse wavelength is called the wave number, but perhaps that should be ignored) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.23.239.78 (talk) 10:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)