Talk:New Jersey Route 41/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 21:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
There are quite a few red links in the article. If these all have a good chance of being made into articles, then leave them, but if they don't, please de-link them.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I have completed everything except for a full review of the prose. I'm being called away from my computer right now, so I won't be able to finish it right away, but I should be able to complete it later tonight or tomorrow morning at the latest. I'll drop a note here when I'm finished. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished the prose review, and didn't find anything to add, so I'm going to put the article on hold to wait for a response to the one comment above. Dana boomer (talk) 00:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone back and removed some of the redlinks. Dough4872 (talk) 02:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 14:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]