Talk:New York State Route 118/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk · contribs) 17:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Looks good, just a few housekeeping items before passing. --AdmrBoltz 17:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Prose

• With your 1905/7 amounts, can you use the {{inflation}} template to provide more current amounts?
• The jct list needs a key / footer.

Images

• File:NY-118.svg should be tagged as {{PD-USGov-MUTCD}}.

Still hate that inflation template. If these template upgrades don't make that easier, protest will ensue. Everything is changed for the record. Also, may I ask leaving my GANs alone, personal preference and request at WT:USRD that USRD editors abstain from reviewing my articles. Mitch32^{(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.)} 20:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Looks good to me. Would you prefer if I put out for a second opinion, or would you like me to pass it.? --AdmrBoltz 20:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Pass it, just a note for the future. Mitch32^{(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.)} 22:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Pass --AdmrBoltz 22:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)