Talk:New York State Route 173

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew York State Route 173 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starNew York State Route 173 is part of the New York State Route 20N series, a good topic. It is also part of the New York State Route 20SY series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed
June 19, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
November 24, 2008Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Needs some {{convert}} templates in both the body and exit list.. I would suggest measuring distances in feet or yards for values < 1 mile.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Probably could use a better image more representative of the road
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Rob (talk) 01:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Couple problems. 1) There is no source for feet and yards, so .1 of a mile is as far as it can go. 2) Convert templates aren't necessary in the exit list.Mitch32contribs 01:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All right, then that addresses all my problems. —Rob (talk) 02:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]