Talk:New York State Route 32B/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   ".2 mi (0.32 km)" looks like a rounding error.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Is there at least a rough estimate of how long the initial length of the highway is? If it used to be fairly long (> 50 miles or so) the map is misleading me into thinking this was a tiny road.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   An image of the current route is preferred, but in this case not necessary due to the short length of the road.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Few questions, but otherwise good. —Rob (talk) 03:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

All things clarified and/or fixed. Thanks!Mitch32^(UP) 10:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Passing, but a couple of suggestions - the article could use an image, and a real map. If you have one of U.S. 4 in New York, crop it to the portion between Northumberland and Hudson Falls and use that instead - it's better than the misleading(ish) map. I'd probably drop the existing map altogether - I don't even know where in New York that is! :-) —Rob (talk) 04:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)