Talk:New York State Route 65/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AdmrBoltz 23:20, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments[edit]

  • "3 miles (5 km) to the north of Honeoye Falls" - new sentences should not start with numbers.
    • Also, that sentence is a run on.
      • Revised slightly. – TMF 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "New York State Thruway (Interstate 90 or I-90)." - is there a need to mention Interstate 90 at all here?
    • Why shouldn't it be? – TMF 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • It seems redundant, but its not a reason to hold the GA. --AdmrBoltz 01:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • How is it redundant? A casual reader from Kingston who isn't brushed up on their geography could read this article, see the Thruway link, and assume it was I-87. – TMF 01:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
          • True, then since you do not refer to I-90 anywhere else drop just the I-90 portion and leave just the linked Interstate 90. --AdmrBoltz 02:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
            • Now that I can agree with. Done. – TMF 02:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "CSX Transportation-owned West Shore Subdivision" - doesn't seem to be supported by the Y! Maps reference.
    • I sincerely question if this claim even needs a reference. It's hardly controversial and I doubt anyone would ever call it into question. The other alternative here is to just say the road passes over a railroad line, and I think doing so detracts from the quality of the article. – TMF 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]