Talk:New York State Route 86/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The notes about the Winter Olympics and trout fishing are notable and necessary for further promotion of the article, but I can't help but think some sort of reference linking the sites to that road (or the area) would help reinforce the case.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Very close. Let me know if you are unable to find the reference that I hope exists. —Rob (talk) 03:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Reference found.Mitch32^(UP) 10:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)