Talk:Newfoundland pony/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 05:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • External links are good and no DABs
  • Pics appropriately licensed.
  • Can you link to the Canadian Animal Pedigree Act?
  • We don't have an article on it. I've played around with creating one, but so far haven't found enough in-depth sources to be sure that it's actually notable enough for an article. More research into this is on my to-do list, though. Dana boomer (talk) 14:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • What does this mean? Pinto horses may not be registered. They don't meet the breed standards because of their coloration?
    Yes, I rephrased that a bit, pending Dana doing a check. --MTBW
  • What do you mean by driving horses?
    Rephrased slightly and wikilinked. Does that help? --MTBW
  • The titles of the rest of your references are in title case, do the same for Fraser.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Popped by and tweaked a couple things, Dana is lead though, so I shall defer to her on checking my answers and changes. (MTBW)- Montanabw(talk) 06:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Sturm. I think between Montana and I we've addressed your points above? Dana boomer (talk) 14:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]