Talk:NewsFix

NewsFix was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 7, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on NewsFix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:NewsFix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 17:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An initial note: there are two deadlinks in the references, per this tool. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:57, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've copyedited a little; please revert if needed.

The first sentence in the "Format" section is broken up by a long interjection about the production after only two words. This isn't a very readable way to start the article. Can the information about production be pulled out and given separately?
opting to instead use footage involving the story with illustration on the story being reported through narration: I think this could be a bit clearer. What does "illustration on the story" mean? And what does it mean to say it's "reported through narration"?
the substitution of teases before breaks in favor of the aforementioned visual tags to indicate segments and stories set to air: normally "the substitution of X for Y" means that Y was replaced by X. Here I think you mean that the teases are replaced by the tags, so I'd make this "...the elimination of teases" instead.
Apparently there are two separate production processes, for the different regions, but you only mention one narrator for the weeknight editions and one narrator for the weekend editions. Do the KIAH and WSFL versions both use the same narrators?
which regularly fell behind newscasts on most of its main English and Spanish station competitors: clarify that "fell behind" refers to ratings.
with (later aborted) plans to launch a weekday morning newscast earlier that year: how can you have plans to launch something earlier? I'm not sure what is intended here.
Do we need the parenthetical comment about Abrams' resignation? It's a digression here. Similarly, do we need to mention that Duitch later left KDAF?
after being rejected by station management: I think this means "by KDAF's station management"; if so, I'd suggest making that change to make it clearer.

That's everything for a first pass. I'll take another look once these points are addressed. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MrWooHoo: are you planning to respond? I'll wait another week and will fail this article then if I don't hear from you. If you need more time, let me know. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might as well fail it; the editor has been inactive since last year. Slightlymad 05:39, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that. No harm in a waiting a few more days just in case they return; the queue is so long these days I have a lot of sympathy for nominators losing faith in the process. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:09, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No response, so I am failing this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NewsFix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140523232146/http://www.dfw.com/2014/05/20/893577/kdafchannel-33-debuts-anchorless.html to http://www.dfw.com/2014/05/20/893577/kdafchannel-33-debuts-anchorless.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]