Talk:Newton's cannonball

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Top‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missing points and invalid reference to the moon.[edit]

The moon follows an elliptical orbit, not a circular one as this problem describes. Additionally, it also leaves out the elliptical orbit formed when the cannonball is slower than the orbital velocity, but not slow enough to fall to the Earth (effectively the same as firing from the opposite point in the elliptical orbit shown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Black.jeff (talk • contribs) 22:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remember, this cannonball is being fired from the surface of the earth, not beginning above the surface of the earth. So if it is going slower than orbital velocity, it will hit the ground somewhere rather than entering an orbit. 134.29.231.11 (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Single Source[edit]

I've added a reference to Sir Isaac's original book. While this article only has two references, it no longer is "single sourced". If there is no objection in a week or two, I'll remove that banner/template. Jarod (talk) 13:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Newton's cannonball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518185521/http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/more_stuff/Applets/newt/newtmtn.html to http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/more_stuff/Applets/newt/newtmtn.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

problem[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

In here in the thought experience section the cannon stands on vertically not in horizontally. The Gif needs to be modified. Sorghum 14:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

That's not the cannon, it's the tower or mountain it's set on top of. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:23, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mistitled article?[edit]

In the version of Principia referenced in this article, there is no mention of a "cannonball" or even a "cannon". Instead, Newton describes a "stone" being "projected". One possibility is that that there is an issue with the edition of Principia. The referenced Google eBook does not have an edition number, although the date, 1728, suggests the third edition. My home version (from The Great Books) does not mention even the stone, but refers to a low-orbiting moon, so I think it must be the first edition. I would welcome some discussion about how to fix this problem. Most helpful would be some history of how the phrase "Newton's Cannonball" came about in the first place.

-- SpencerRugaber — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpencerRugaber (talk • contribs) 19:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to clarify the textual history of this thought experiment in my recent edits to the article. Spacepotato (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]