Talk:Nexo Knights

Lego Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (5 participants)
Stick Soldiers (0 participants)
Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (6 participants)
Matt Alt (1 participant)
Granny (video game series) (2 participants)
Sago Sago (3 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (2 participants)
Kelly Metzger (9 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (13 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Prentiss and Underwood[edit]

Does anyone recall which episode of the show reveals the surnames of Ava and Robin? I remember the Nexo Knights' names all being used at the start but not these two. The only unique titles I knew for them was 'Lady Ava' and 'Sir Robin' when they got promoted to Junior Knights early on.

Is it possible the surnames aren't used and are derived from some other material, like the toys? I'd just like to include an episode cite if they were used in-universe for the TV just to know if they were toy-exclusive or not. Ranze (talk) 21:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 December 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. No objections in 7 days. Cúchullain ^t/c 22:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Nexo Knights → Nexo Knights – I don't think it is necessary to prefix the title of the series with the Lego stamp. When I record this on PVR it just said 'Nexo Knights' half the time. This isn't like DreamWorks Dragons where it's necessary to include the company to generate a unique name. At https://www.lego.com/en-gb/nexoknights you can see on the yellow menu they just have 'Nexo Knights' in isolation. More importantly the title cards at the start of each episode use a Nexo Knights logo without Lego on it, and the end credits also just call it Nexo Knights, not Lego Nexo Knights. Ranze (talk) 21:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Season 5[edit]

Is it true that Season 5 of Nexo Knights was cancelled due to funding issues?

Construction sets[edit]

Fieryninja I thinking this Construction sets section should move to the new page call Lego Nexo Knights because this page look too big (see Wikipedia:Splitting). If we can separate it out and that would better. Striker2020 (talk) 09:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Striker2020 I think you may be right, in the sense that these could be two separate articles, one about the tv series, one about the product line, similar to Lego Ninjago. If you think you have enough content (background and development) information on the two to split them then go ahead. I doubt I will be able to help much at the moment, as I'm currently splitting out 16 seasons :). However, if you need help on how to do it then I can probably help. Fieryninja (talk) 09:39, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fieryninja I want know how make a request to separate the product line to Lego Nexo Knights page? Striker2020 (talk) 05:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Striker2020 I have given it some thought and I don't think you will be able to split this article. The reason is that splitting is usually based on the size of the page. This article is 30,857 bytes. If you look at the criteria for splitting at WP:SPLIT you will see the recommended sizes in the Size Split section (typically over 50,000). When I split Ninjago (TV series) it was a very large article with 15 seasons. Nexo Knights only had four. If you want to get opinions from other editors about it, look at WP:PROPSPLIT. Hope that is helpful. Fieryninja (talk) 07:38, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fieryninja you're right. How about if I copy the product line and put into the new page and I will add overview and development? Striker2020 (talk) 08:33, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Striker2020 that is the same thing as an article split. If you create a new page for the product line you have to provide attribution for any copied content, see WP:CWW. You need to be clear about why you think this page needs splitting. The content about the tv series would need a lot of work. Fieryninja (talk) 08:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Striker2020 maybe you could expand the content for the tv series and products and then see if it is large enough to split it? Fieryninja (talk) 08:59, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fieryninja I will expand this page but for the tv series that might take the long way for me to find the sources just like the Ninjago. If you can help me to find the sources for tv series so we can work together. Striker2020 (talk) 14:16, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Striker2020 OK I will have a look and see if I can find any sources. Fieryninja (talk) 14:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]