Talk:Nicaragua–United States relations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nicaragua Low‑importance

	Nicaragua portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nicaragua, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nicaragua on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NicaraguaWikipedia:WikiProject NicaraguaTemplate:WikiProject NicaraguaNicaragua articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Embassy of the United States, Managua was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 16 January 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Nicaragua–United States relations. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Untitled[edit]

I placed the POV tag when creating the article because it is pasted from a US government website. Because this comes from a US govt source it may not be neutral, but I don't have the expertise to judge. (Hopefully others that know more will simply remove the tag if they think the article looks okay.) Mangostar (talk) 01:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just heard in my world politics class that the US and Nicaragua have previously had sour relations, specifically, one took the other to an international court and the United States left the international justice system after the court ruled in favor of Nicaragua. I wanted to find out more, not get a US government publication. Thus, I agree the POV is not neutral, as there is no evidence of this event here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.114.219.25 (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I likewise agree that the article is highly biased in favor of the USA; it does not even mention the Contras, if I recall correctly. 自教育 (talk) 20:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Section on early History? William Walker?[edit]

I feel like this article would be remiss if it did not mention William Walker (filibuster), a man who sojourned down to Nicaragua during a civil war there and made himself president. He reinstated slavery and ruled like a despot; yet his government received recognition from the U.S. under the administration of Franklin Pierce. Walker was an important example of many people's desire in the Southern and Western United states to spread slavery into Latin America. This is an important event in defining early relations between the two countries.

It seems like this article seems to only cover recent relations between the two countries right now.

24.167.247.76 (talk) 05:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nicaragua–United States relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]