Talk:Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why *That* Obituary?[edit]

Why mention an obituary written by a white-supremacist website? What purpose does it serve other than to tarnish Dr. Goodrick-Clarke's reputation by association? I'm removing the reference because there's already an obit in the references, this one from a reputable source (The Times of London).

The offending passage:

"John Morgan of the white supremacist blog Counter-Currents published an obituary.

Mpaniello (talk) 03:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mpaniello,
Your reaction seems stronger than anything in the "offending" passage, which is factual and neutrally phrased. I would think this note gives relevant context considering what (and, perhaps more pertinently, who) NGC studied. Fwiw, within the field, his book on Savitri Devi is regarded as rather inappropriately sympathetic. I am restoring the reference. 77.248.183.115 (talk) 14:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can I please get some help here from someone who can adjudicate this to avoid a warring editors situation? I removed a reference citing an obituary for NGC in a white-supremacist website because I'm pretty sure it doesn't pass muster as a reputable source and as mentioned in my first post, there's already an obit from the Times of London. Thanks. Mpaniello (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]