Talk:Night action of 1/2 December 1917

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Night action of 1/2 December 1917 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: British / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

New article[edit]

The 32nd Division role in the attack is to follow, until when, the article won't be ready for assessment. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 12:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith-264: I'm going to assess it as a C right now given that you are adding that information, although in honesty it could easily receive a B. "I'd rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me" - George S. Patton :: markus1423 (talk) 14:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, most of the Battle section is to follow plus a few bits here and there. Lo Cicero's prose is rather poor so I'm having to piece the narrative together. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 14:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons cat[edit]

@Mike Peel: What should the commons cat be? Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 16:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith-264: I don't think the right one exists at the moment. Not too sure if it's worth creating a new one - do you know if there are other media about this topic that aren't in the article? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not off the top of my head, I'll have a poke around. regardsKeith-264 (talk) 01:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]