Talk:Nippon Foundation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:17, May 4, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Statement removed[edit]

I commented out the statement about forced sterilizations. It's very vague, and it appears that the citation was added without the editor actually looking at the article (which was in a French Communist Party newspaper). We have no clue what level of involvement that's supposed to mean: did Sasakawa know what was going on, or was the involvement indirect through his connections with Peru? Unless other sources can be found to describe the connection, it shouldn't be in the article. - Sekicho 09:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

→ I am adding the statement again with sources cited in the Alberto Fujimori article section on human rights violations.Guzmas31 (talk) 04:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--The topic does have a place in this section of the article, but the way it was written seems to cast aspersions which are unsupported by the articles cited. TheGilbert (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

Many one-sided opinions have been written in this article. And this page is not article of Sasakawa. Does writer dislike that foundation?Vip001 19:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Facts are facts. Do any research on the foundation and the same information will show up. Reverting. Try to provide information in articles, if possible. Do not delete information without good justification (too large size, repetitive, unnecessary, or inaccurate).--Sir Edgar 05:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot understand what you say and what you do. You didn't answer my question. Your edits are almost all topics of Sasagawa. Are you all right? If you wanna write down, move to article of Sasagawa please.Vip001 13:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop whitewashing this article.[edit]

Assholes.--Sir Edgar 04:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on sources[edit]

Not that I understand anything about the subject but I'd like to point out that Debito.org and the Voltaire Network are, to put it mildly, fairly unreliable sources. Pascal.Tesson 02:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Made article pertinent to topic[edit]

Taking the Sasakawa related items out of this article, (since he has his own exhaustive wiki entry), I found that there was remarkably little real information about the Nippon Foundation here. The problem seems to be that most English writing about the foundation is not about the work that it does, but about its ties to Ryoichi Sasakawa, a man who died nearly 15 years ago.

Given the apparently positive nature of most of the foundation’s work, and the increasingly tenuous connection between it and its founder, I feel justified in focussing not on speculation and conspiracy theory but on the verifiable facts of what the foundation does, as mentioned on its English and Japanese websites, a couple of books, and some publications that I had the good luck to find in a Jimbocho bookstore.

Given the fact that there is remarkably little about the foundation in English that has not been written by people with an eye to political conspiracy, I have gone to Japanese sources to find out just what it is that it does, and am herewith providing the results of my study.

CoffeeCup10 (talk) 09:49, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article has some detailed information about the Nippon Foundation: History on Trial: French Nippon Foundation Sues Scholar for Libel to Protect the Honor of Sasakawa Ryōichi by Karoline Postel-Vinay with Mark Selden. --Klein zach 14:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the point about Takashi Sasakawa, since it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the topic of the article. TheGilbert (talk) 10:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Class A World War II Criminal[edit]

The beginning of this article states that this organization's founder, Sasakawa, was a Class A World War II criminal. But Wikipedia's article on Sasakawa said he was only accused of being one and was acquitted. If he was acquitted, then he wasn't actually one after all, right? 58.88.80.145 (talk) 11:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)DK[reply]

Precicely. Someone seems to want to insist that he was, so I revised it again. A "Class A war criminal" is a specific legal term, and is only usable if the accused has actually been convicted. He wasn't.TheGilbert (talk) 10:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Nippon Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bias editing[edit]

The predominant activities of the charity have nothing to do with war crimes or sasakawa's politics or revisionism. Yes, Sasakawa is controversial, but let's not make wikipedia a place of agitation politics. Seeing that the Korean version of this article doesn't even mention any charitable activities, it's clear that this foundation is seen with a large amount of animosity among South Korean nationalists. There should be a section for criticismd, but this stuff shouldn't be so prominent in the introduction. Dplre (talk) 05:59, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]