Talk:Nissan Rogue

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rogue Nameplate[edit]

Did Nissan buy the nameplate trademark from AMC, or did they give it to them for free? Nospamtodd (talk) 03:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Qashqai/Rogue Design[edit]

The statement here that the Rogue/Qashqai is built off the Sentra platform is wrong. As noted on the Qashqai page, it was a fresh "clean-sheet" design - all the automotive press articles seem to have made the same mistake.Scunnerous (talk) 07:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell does "Important is to note that Rogue's C platform, is not a carry-over from the Sentra's, given that the platform suffered modifications (as in most of cars sharing a platform)." mean? The platform did not suffer any modifications and this is not even English. I'll be chucking this garbage out when I have time and reverting to what I previously edited myself with improved wording, though it WAS in English to start with.Scunnerous (talk) 21:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?[edit]

Why is it necessary to maintain separate Rogue and Qashqai/Dualis pages? I mean, they're not just related, they're the same car. Since Qashqai is the original, Rogue should simply be a redirect. 118.208.150.121 (talk) 06:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, tagged both articles and begun formal discussion here Splateagle (talk) 11:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
They are not the same car. There is enough unique information about the Rogue to warrant a separate article, and merging them will cause confusion and suggest that the Rogue is inherently less important in comparison. I sense some regional bias. --Vossanova o< 20:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Vossanova is right. Given the lack of support for the merge I've removed the merge proposal template. 72.244.206.114 (talk) 07:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renault Koleos[edit]

I believe the Renault Koleos has to be added as Related Vehicle.

Also, if the pages of the Qashqai and Dualis are merged with this, may be the page for the Koleos should be merged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.206.91.131 (talk) 15:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a Dualis[edit]

Nope, that's not a Dualis, that's a Murano. 115.64.228.228 (talk) 04:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nissan Rogue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Red Rogue Sport[edit]

Can’t one get light leather interior added over charcoal if no grey leather? Gcson01 (talk) 02:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KR15DDT Investigation[edit]

I added a section on the KR15DDT investigation but I kinda suck at citation formatting, as the document and page referenced aren't typical "articles", but the links are in there. ```` ZeeFBI (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]