Talk:No. 73 Wing RAAF/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 10:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citations: - the citation check tool reveals no errors (no action required)
Disambiguations: none found - [3] (no action required)
Linkrot: Ext links all work - [4] (no action required)
Alt text: Images lack alt text (although this is not a requirement for GA anyway so its up to you if you want to add it or not) - [5] (no action required)
- Will do this to keep the std for other GAs I've done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:13, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
- ~~I think this may be a typo: "No. 71 Wing was under the command of Group Captain Ian McLachlan." (Pretty sure you mean No. 73 Wing right?).~~
- Fixed now, cheers Ian. Anotherclown (talk) 06:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':

Overall:
a Pass/Fail:
- ~~Only one minor issue, other than that I could find little to fault this article. Once this is resolved it will easily pass the GA criteria IMO.~~ Anotherclown (talk) 10:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Issue resolved, happy to pass. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 06:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Many tks as usual for reviewing, mate. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:13, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]