Talk:Nocaster

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing paux pas?[edit]

In the revision of the article of 20:42, January 18, 2009, the line "This fact is irrelevant and confusing." was added, probably commenting on a previous editing. Is there a tag or template that would serve this purpose better than having this comment mid-article? De Moriarty (talk) 22:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thinline nocaster[edit]

Also fender custom shop made a 20 piece special series of thinline nocasters in 2010. Although originally there was no thinline, these are called nocaster thinline and I think apart from the semi-hollow body are the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.72.8.198 (talk) 20:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?[edit]

Wouldn't this stub of information be more appropriately merged with the Telecaster article? The Telecaster is a major part of modern guitar history; the Nocaster is a chapter in the story of the Telecaster (along with eg. teh Squier Telecaster, a once-separate article which has been merged with Telecaster.) Frank Mottley (talk) 21:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. Do the merge. The sooner the better. Be bold. BellwetherToday (talk) 04:37, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]