Talk:Non-Summit

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Non-Summit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131226133248/http://www.agbnielsen.co.kr/index.asp?ref=0 to http://www.agbnielsen.co.kr/index.asp?ref=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb[edit]

I'm coming here from this discussion Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Non-Summit IMDb link as this talk page is the correct place to discuss the inclusion of the IMDb link. As mentioned there, IMDb is generally acceptable as an external link unlike as a RS per Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites#IMDb. There also isn't a requirement for only one external link. However that doesn't mean IMDb is required. IMDb is often useful as it provides more info albeit generally with less reliability than wikipedia. But in this case, perhaps because it's a South Korean game show under discussion, I don't see what useful info the IMDb link Non-Summit at IMDb provides. It's very bare bones with a cast of 3 people, a release date, country of origin and language, alternative name [1], a production company and links to the official site and a few news stories [2]. Oh and a single cast shot (or something) and the amazing detail that it's in colour ;-) Nearly all of these are already in the article. (Well we mention it's a JTBC show but don't seem to really mention it's a JTBC production and don't directly mention it's in colour. And I'm not sure if we everything that IMDb has as an external source. But we do mention that the 3 people who are just list as series cast are the presenters and a lot of other useful info such as number of episodes and and seasons, and the game show is about that IMDb does now.) So I would support exclusion of the IMDb link. Nil Einne (talk) 10:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also support excluding the IMDb link for this article, as it does not offer additional useful information not currently present on the WP article. Thank you Nil Einne for your helpful discussion of this.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 03:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]