Talk:Nonimaging optics
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Nonimaging optics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061222110419/http://hep.uchicago.edu:80/solar/design.html to http://hep.uchicago.edu/solar/design.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Theory Section[edit]
Hi,
First of all thanks to everyone for the work put in to this page so far. I just added a {{Disputed-section}} tag in the section Flow-line design method. The section does not actually describe the Flow-Line method which is based on the flow lines in 6 dimensional phase space. Instead, it repeats the ideas of the Edge Ray principle and provides examples which should go into a separate section.
Also I think that the Edge Ray principle should be moved under the Design Methods header. All in all it seems that the whole theory section needs some restructuring.
Cheers
Notjustphysics (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)