Talk:Nord Anglia International School Dubai

This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor declined the request. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits.

Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely.

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because the article is about an organisation for which there is not already a Wikipedia page. --377ata (talk) 06:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because it includes relevant references and is about an entity which previously did not have a Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 377ata (talk • contribs) 06:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance tags[edit]

@EvergreenFir: Sorry, i think i collided with u over placing maintenance tags. Actually till i click "Submit" button, nothing so was on the page. After it was purged, i thought i misused twinkle. But the page history gave me breather. You may remove the tags i placed of revert wholly, if required. Thank you --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 06:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Balablitz: No worries. Let the reviewing admin sort it out I say. :) Cheers EvergreenFir (talk) 07:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

I removed all references to http://www.desertspeak.com/ because it is a forum, and so is not considered a reliable source. More independent (3rd-party) reliable published sources are needed here. DES ^(talk) 18:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]