Talk:Norfolk Orbital Railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fakenham[edit]

What is the situation with Fakenham? Will this scheme re-use one of the former stations, or will a new station be constructed. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revamp[edit]

This page looks a bit tired, so I'm hoping to revamp it over the next couple of weeks. I'll be adding a photo gallery first, then breaking this gallery down into sections as part of an improved Line status section. I'll also be hoping to add a number of additional references. DiverScout (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

the article doesn't seem to have enough reliable sources. Hasn't been updated since 2014 and no movement on the so called proposal. Plus new housing in Fakeham on the former cutting. This is speculation and no movement in last five years. It should be deleted or merged with Norfolk North Railway and also Mid Norfolk Railway. Its speculation and not concrete evidence. Apart from one purchase of land near Fakenham. Its speculation. It should be merged or deleted - Signed Joshuaisthefalco 15:28. 17th November 2019 JoshuaIsTheFalco (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article is adequately sourced. Activity on the project has continued this year and is ongoing (in fact I will add a new news link after posting this reply). The addition of misleading reports relating to a section of formation not even associated with this project is meaningless. The purchase of land at Holt and Fakenham is not speculation, and the article is about an active and ongoing project that is independent of both the North Norfolk Railway and the Mid-Norfolk Railway. Neith-Nabu (talk) 20:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@JoshuaIsTheFalco, the deletion nomination was originally posted in the wrong place, I've fixed it now. @Neith-Nabu, you may want to copy your comment over to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norfolk Orbital RailwayThjarkur (talk) 20:44, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I have done. Neith-Nabu (talk) 20:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Planned Route[edit]

This is clearly part of the data on the proposal and I intend to restore that information unless a rational argument is given for its deletion. Neith-Nabu (talk) 19:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Route problem verifiability appears resolved through deleting editor posting their requested map of the route as described. Accordingly, I will draft and add a shortened description of the route at some point soon. Neith-Nabu (talk) 19:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]