Talk:Norma Paulus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNorma Paulus has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 14, 2009Good article nomineeListed
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 1, 2019.

Certificates of Mastery[edit]

Shouldn't wait until the Senate passes the same measure and the gov. signs off on it? Aboutmovies 05:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably right, I guess the talk page would have been a better spot for it. I was thinking that since the vote was so overwhelming, it is likely to pass those hurdles, and is noteworthy enough that someone interested in Paulus would be poorly served by not having it mentioned. But you point is well taken…if you revert, I won't be hurt! -Pete 21:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion source[edit]

This has a small amount of info to add to the SOS time. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Norma Paulus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of conflict of interest - but would like to still contribute[edit]

To all the folks that have built this page, thanks for helping to fill in gaps in Oregon's political history. Your work is greatly appreciated by many that care about the subject. I have made some edits to this page in the past several years, either without an account, and since January 2017, with the account of lgrayp. As a novice Wikipedian, I unwittingly committed a primary error, in editing a page of someone I'm related to. All edits under those IPs, and user "lgrayp" have been in good faith, and any changes of factual nature or Wikipedia style are appreciated. In the future, to follow the rules of Wikimedia, I will not make direct edits. However, I would like to suggest edits for other to consider. I welcome suggestions of how to interact appropriately. Should I post suggestion for edits in the Talk page? If there is no one else watching this page, I'll look to refer suggestions to others. Thanks again - lgrayp (talk) 19:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC) (talk) 01:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Example of suggested edit: Under Political Career section, 3rd para, link phrase "Eagleton Institute of Politics and Policy" to that related Wikipedia page "Eagleton Institute". Note: That institution's "Center for Women..." was not formed until the 1980s, so the parent organization is the relevant link in context. Thanks for considering lgrayp (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]