Talk:North Dakota State Capitol

United States: North Dakota Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota (assessed as High-importance).

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Height[edit]

According to http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=fargohighrise-fargo-nd-usa this is not the highest building in terms of stories -- the Fargo High Rise is taller, at 22. Therefore I am deleting that assertion from the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TravisNygard (talk • contribs)

Criticism?[edit]

I realise criticism sections, like virtually everything else that made wikipedia interesting and useful back in the day, are now considered somewhat passé by Jimbo and friends, but the complete LACK of criticism in this article really needs to be addressed. Even in cities that are otherwise hideous, American state capitols are almost always beautiful examples of the sort of neo-classical early American architecture that never seemed to catch on elsewhere. But having an eye-meltingly hideous office tower instead is almost an affront to the people of North Dakota. Seriously, this building is so ugly it looks like it belongs in Boston's financial district.

24.91.244.221 (talk) 00:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the public record, the reference to North Dakota's government growing while its population has shrunk is behind the times. The population of North Dakota is greater by 100,000 than is previous upper limit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.56.181.196 (talk) 03:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on North Dakota State Capitol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070925025915/http://www.realnd.com/capitolmap.htm to http://www.realnd.com/capitolmap.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]