Talk:North Druid Hills, Georgia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

Harry J. Carr, had three children, Gladys, Harry, Jr., and Frances. Frances's second oldest Kathy worked at installing and documenting the Carr effect on the Houstin Mill Property. Contact information can be achieved by contacting Kathy Kirby Harmer at mharmer@bellsouth.net —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.235.76.71 (talk) 00:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment[edit]

If you would like to know why I assessed the article the way I have, please use my talk page. Ethan (talk) 20:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 11:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


– The article says that the community is actually better known as Briarcliff. Georgia guy (talk) 15:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. While both names may be used, it looks like the Druid Hills form is favored by major sources like the USGS, Google Maps, etc., and also appears to be used frequently by local websites. ╠╣uw [talk] 01:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Please do not confuse Druid Hills with North Druid Hills. Georgia guy (talk) 13:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the topic is North Druid Hills, which is the name that major reputable sources seem to use: Google Maps, US Geological Survey, US Census Bureau, etc. ╠╣uw [talk] 09:51, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: I live very closeby and no one calls it Briarcliff -- I would challenge you to find media which support this usage. It is North Druid Hills. That is the census designation. The local "Patch" online newspaper is called the North Druid Hills edition. There is a proposal to create a City of Briarcliff which includes both Druid Hills and North Druid Hills. (see http://northdruidhills.patch.com/articles/discuss-what-about-a-city-of-briarcliff#pdf-13719069) Keizers (talk) 00:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be good, then, to change the article's lede so that Druid Hills is given as the primary name. That seemingly is how it was until January when an IP editor flipped it... ╠╣uw [talk] 09:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not Briarcliff[edit]

Per the earlier comments on this talk page, the CDP is not also known as Briarcliff. So I just removed all such references to that effect. Here's an easy to read map of the CDP: http://georgia.hometownlocator.com/maps/boundary-map,mode,place,geoid,1356168.cfm The NW portion may be referred to as Briarcliff by some, but certainly not the rest of the CDP. Anyone who wants to make the claim needs to provide a reliable source and maintain a NPOV. Also note the incorporation movement described in the article. Those in favor of incorporation would like to have the entire area knows as Briarcliff, so trying to sneak this into the article is neither neutral nor balanced. Chrisclaire88 (talk) 14:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on North Druid Hills, Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]