Talk:North Woolwich

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent[edit]

Would be interesting to find out how long the association with Kent goes back. Morwen - Talk 15:57, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps at least to the start of the Woolwich Ferry (14th Century) ? MRSC 16:37, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

""Conversely, the area of the eastern part that lies north of the docks – an area of employment land, infrastructure facilities and post-industrial dereliction, with very few residents – is more usually seen as being part of Beckton, an area that has never had any formal definition" - what is "employment land"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.109.101.165 (talk) 18:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead paragraph[edit]

I've reverted the article back to the last stable version from March this year so that the current issues with the lead paragraph can be discussed - I don't think anything vital got reverted at the same time. Here strikes me as a half-decent place to have that discussion, unless someone tells me it's occurring elsewhere.

I have significant concerns about the OLINKs added in recently - we have no need to link either London or England per WP:OLINK. I also feel the pipe of East London applied just to east is a little misleading - not the worst I've seen. And then there's the whole "it used to be/no it is/no it used to be/is/used" bunfight. So, lats stable version and discuss from there... Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]