Talk:OASIS SOA Reference Model
 | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/18487/wd-soa-rm-pr2.doc. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2006100910007465. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Untitled[edit]
OASIS, copyright holder for the article, "OASIS SOA Reference Model (SOA-RM)," grants permission to post this article on Wikipedia's under GFDL.
Carol Geyer Director of Communications OASIS
Issues[edit]
Quality / Notability / References[edit]
I restructured the article in April and added some references but I did not remove the rewrite, notability and reference tags. While I agree that the article needs more work, I think the tags may now be removed. --RichardVeryard 10:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- I removed the later to tags as I believe they have been addressed. I left the rewrite tag, because the bullet points need to be rewritten as prose.--BirgitteSB 13:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Context[edit]
This is a big problem. The article on SOA is not good enough - because there isn't sufficient consensus about SOA concepts and principles - there is too much POV on the subject, mostly from IT vendors. The whole point of the OASIS reference model is to produce something better and more neutral. It is probably the best vendor-neutral account of SOA currently available (hence its notability) but it is not yet widely adopted, so it cannot yet be regarded as NPOV. This makes it very difficult for WP to clearly explain what SOA is as an introduction to this article without either adopting the OASIS account or alternatively adopting a more controversial (and possibly more confusing) account. --RichardVeryard 10:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)