Talk:Oakland, New Jersey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Date of formation[edit]

It says Oakland was created in 1902 out of Franklin Township. It may have come from Franklin, but it was founded in 1695, according to all of the "Welcome to Oakland" signs throughout the town. I fixed it. I live in Oakland, BTW. Cao Wei 20:44, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bergen Township and Hackensack Township were craeted in 1693, but Oakland was not craeted in 1693 and 1695. The year 1902 is accurate, regardless of what appears on signs. Alansohn 22:02, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That might be date of first settlement within the current borders. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 23:33, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I was probably wrong. My friend's dad has lived in Oakland for years, I'm gonna ask him. Thanks. Cao Wei 19:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a few things and do have one concern.[edit]

I added some info in the Transportation section. (a little more detail and the addition of links to the (schedules)

I also added a external link to http://www.myoaklandnj.com (Personally I find it fun to read - heh)

My one concern is the content of the section of Commerce. I quote:

"There isn't much shopping in Oakland for a town of its size located right off a major interstate highway. "

To me this is an opinion and not a fact. IMHO there is plenty of shopping. This seems to try and point out someones opinion on "our" current downtown. I feel wikipedia should not be used in this manner.

I refuse to edit it myself since it is border line but would like hear some feed back.

Peace,

Jamoc74 08:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After actually looking at the edit logs - There was a lot more to this section (IE: the local retail business names at copper tree) as well as some more info. I'm new to editing wiki but some of the info is still prevalent. I still feel the opening line needs some work ;)

Jamoc74 08:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, the commerce section violates the NPOV rule and needs cleanup, feel free to do so. Also, I've got a question.. although there is no rail service currently, was there at one time? Are there railroad lines that traverse Oakland? --ChrisRuvolo (t) 14:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
At one point I think there was. From what I recall of town history the old post office and or municipal building (now gone) was a rail station at one point (many many many moons ago) located on 202 and W.Oakland (south side of the tracks)
As far as the commerce section, I think I will try and put put together a more balanced perspective.
Thanks for the reply,
Jamoc74 10:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that matches up with the Image:Bergen Passaic 1872.jpg map. It shows a Oakland stop on the New Jersey Midland Railroad (no article for that yet). --ChrisRuvolo (t) 14:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Over a year ago - wow :) I cleaned up the commerce section a bit (I hope) I tried to keep it on the same track. I know it needs more work - but figgured this would be ok for now. Jamoc74 (talk) 06:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commerce Section[edit]

I really don't see what's wrong with the way it is now, where no businesses are mentioned. If you're gonna mention some without proper citation, you need to mention others too.

Just out of curiosity, would the below be a good citation?

http://www.northjersey.com/food_dining/127083323_At_Gelotti__makingfrozen_treats_is_likecreating_an_artwork.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.202.206 (talk) 04:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Muller's Park shootout[edit]

Referring to Oakland residents as "townies", seems a bit derogatory. Sounds like a term that might be used by an out of town "frat boy", describing the local yokels.

Suggest..."local residents", or at worst "Oaklanders". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.217.173.196 (talk) 18:48, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Oakland, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]