Talk:Oakville, Washington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Acid Rain[edit]

Can someone please give a reference to the "most longtime residents of Oakville claimed this never happened" part? I have a friend in Oakville, who can definetly confirm that this happened.

I live about a half hours drive from Oakville and if the whole gelatinous goo from sky thing wasn't true, I would have heard about it. I'm just going to go ahead and remove that part. Redtitan 03:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Acid rain would be a good explanation if A) It was a normal liquid consistency and B) It didn't have biological ingredients. This is one of the weirdest things I've ever heard of, and I don't think it was anything malicious, but it can't be just acid rain. That sounds like a "Here, now shut up and go away" official made-up answer. It could be jellyfish...but then how'd the human parts get in there? Ypsidan (talk) 19:32, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Here's an article, but it doesn't seem to be reputable: http://listverse.com/2010/01/14/10-more-enigmas-that-defy-explanation/ Kevin chen2003 (talk) 23:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also look up "Star jelly" in Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.243.99.13 (talk) 01:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd like to see a more reputable source for the blob rain section. The two links provided seem like pretty weak evidence. Does anyone have a news article or something?184.187.191.254 (talk) 03:32, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • the picture of it going around just looks like old frogspawn you know — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.211.72.43 (talk) 07:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • the blobs are salamander eggs, specifically: northwestern salamanders. a quick image search leads to the original pictures — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.89.135.230 (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blobs?[edit]

I removed this section (again) because (again) there is no reliable source. Unsolved mysteries is a provocative TV show, not a source for an encyclopedia, and google didn't return any sources that would be RS either. Noformation (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Unsolved Mysteries page is a reliable source for the claim that this town has been featured by Unsolved Mysteries because it directly supports the claim. Being featured on national television is a notable event. For the rest of this section, I can also use these 1994 articles to talk about the blobs: Observer-Reporter The Post and Courier Arizona Daily Star Fort Worth Star-Telegram The Free Lance-Star --184.4.202.66 (talk) 21:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Those sources look good, thanks for digging them up. Noformation Talk 21:48, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Oakville, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]