Talk:Oakwood, Leeds

Tesco

Tesco is in the Roundhay council ward, so they are entitled to the name. In terms of traditional areas it is in Gledhow, facing Gipton Wood. It is well southwest of the Oakwood Boundary Road. Chemical Engineer (talk) 11:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Farmers Market

This seems too long and too much like advertising. As a recent and temporary feature it deserves a mention but not much more. There are lots of such markets.Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus for move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Oakwood, Leeds → Oakwood, West Yorkshire — WP:NCGN#England states that everywhere in apart from Greater London should be disambiguated as placename, ceremonial county→which would therefore meen Oakwood, West Yorkshire as Leeds is a city and a district/borough within West Yorkshire. Homan's Copse (talk) 19:52, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose for same reasons as Beeston, Leeds: while the above argument would work for Wetherby, which is a separate town within the City of Leeds metropolitan borough, Beeston is clearly a suburb of Leeds and hence should be identified with the city (with a small c) rather than the borough (City with a capital) or with the ceremonial county.  — Amakuru (talk) 06:48, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose as above.--J3Mrs (talk) 10:24, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose For same reasons as above. Tomd2712 | Tell me something? 10:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
• Strongly oppose WP:NCGN#England clearly states that the cemeremonial county form does not apply to, "localities which are unambiguously part of a larger town or city, in which case [[placename, town/city]] is used." Oakwood is a suburb of Leeds, surrounded by other suburbs. Nick Cooper (talk) 11:51, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oakwood, Leeds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629173226/http://www.farmersmarkets.net/ to http://www.farmersmarkets.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)