The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject OWS, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.OWSWikipedia:WikiProject OWSTemplate:WikiProject OWSOWS articles
Additional "more reliable" sources will be added as soon as larger media organizations take notice. Thus far it has been documentation by the group executing the actions. Burleyc1 (talk) 07:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:CRYSTAL and WP:UPANDCOMING. Wouldn't it be better to wait to create the article until after it had been documented by third parties? VQuakr (talk) 07:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
there was supposedly something in the San Jose Mercury News but I can't find it on their website --Frantik (talk) 16:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
here's an actual article about the encampment, which might be shut down on friday --75.36.145.115 (talk) 08:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC
The first three items in the bulleted list in this article are irrelevant to Occupy San Jose specifically and are already covered in detail in related articles. If there is no opposition, I will go ahead and remove them in a day or two. Further, I do believe that prose is prefered over lists when it comes to articles but that is a separate discussion. MIC CHECK! ShakerSJC (talk) 18:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect discussion occurring for this article[edit]
There's a discussion occurring regarding a proposal to redirect this article to the Occupy Wall Street article, occurring here: at the administrator's noticeboard. Please feel free to comment regarding this matter there. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above was closed on 21 October 2011 (UTC). Northamerica1000(talk) 23:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the Russia Today news template from the page, as it had raised concern because it pointed to a single trending news page, rather than a selection of trend pages, and after discussion in the appropriate places, it's easier to remove it than it is to add lots of other trend pages, as I don't know of any (don't have time to look). If there are any comments, concerns, or suggestions please reply on my talkpage, as I don't watch this page. Penyulap ☏ 03:41, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
