Talk:Of Grammatology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

Older comments[edit]

I'm not a Derrida scholar, but I think it's pretty egregious that this page doesn't exist yet. So... I'll take a stab at at and hope that more qualified people can fix things up. Superabo 03:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(86.75.111.161 (talk) 02:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC))600 Petit exercice de déconstruction appliquée à l'ouvrage de Derrida grammaire-et-logique.tract-8.over-blog.com/articl... - Translate this page[reply]

FR-ENG Knol 000 Présentation des trois collections de Jean ...

Le mot grec grammatologie signifiant science des lettres au sens d'éléments graphiques, le titre de l'ouvrage de Derrida appelé De la grammatologie annonce une approche résolument scientifique de l'écriture envisagée dans les éléments graphiques susceptibles d'être utilisés: lettres de l'écriture alphabétique, caractères de l'écriture chinoise. De la grammatologie est le premier ouvrage de Derrida que j'aurai lu. Et le dernier. Il s'agit non pas d'une étude scientifique des lettres mais d'une réflexion sur la place de l'écriture dans l'activité intellectuelle. Pourquoi alors, se demande-t-on, utiliser un mot grec au lieu du bon vieux mot latin écriture. Pour introduire une note d'optimisme bien nécessaire devant un phénomène fleurant l'imposture, je tiens immédiatement à signaler pour ceux qui s'intéressent à la grammatologie au vrai sens du terme qu'il existe d'excellents ouvrages étudiant sérieusement les différents types d'éléments graphiques. Les références seront donnés.

What?[edit]

"Derrida does not claim to be giving a critique of the work of these thinkers, because he does not believe it possible to escape from operating with such oppositions." Is this, in anyone's opinion, a sentence that makes sense?128.90.113.23 (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Background Clarification[edit]

For which degree would Of Grammatology have been submitted? The Peeters biography says this at p. 166: "Jean Hyppolite and Maurice de Gandillac were encouraging him to present Of Grammatology as a thèse de troisième cycle, which could then be transformed into a thèse complémentaire. This was a tempting proposal, since it was a task from which he would thus be freed on the day he defended his thèse principale." Perhaps this section could be expanded or better explained? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.174.69.66 (talk) 00:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References inadaquate[edit]

"Derrida 1997" is useless as a refference given how thick "Of grammatology" is.Dejvid (talk) 20:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]