Talk:Office of the Chief Scientist (Australia)

	Australia portal Office of the Chief Scientist (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Out of date[edit]

Pretty certain that Julia Gillard (PM) and Tony Abbott (Health Minister) are not in government together, with Swan, Carr, Williams, Truss and Macfarlane. Pretty certain that the members of the committee need review. Is Shine still Chair of NHMRC, etc... Jherschel (talk) 11:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Office of the Chief Scientist (Australia)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Contrary to the low rating this is an important page for understanding the politics of science and technology research and funding in Australia. It's a veritable who's who of the key players, however, a lot of work needs to be done to create articles linking off it. Also it needs a NPOV section to discuss the controversies that are referenced. I'll keep it in my watch list and have a go at editing it.--Chris Blackall 14:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 01:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Office of the Chief Scientist (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070203094246/http://www.dest.gov.au:80/Ministers/Media/Bishop/2006/03/B001280306.asp to http://www.dest.gov.au/Ministers/Media/Bishop/2006/03/B001280306.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]