Talk:Ohio State Route 11/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Secret (talk · contribs) 02:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing per request, give it a day. Secret account 02:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Secret: Its been a week since you picked up this review. Are you going to process it? --AdmrBoltz 19:44, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reviewing now....
  • How the route was decided to be part of the National Highway System?
  • Not including it, because most road articles don't have this either.—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 19:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The highest traffic count is at the southern end of the concurrency with I-80, where 38,360 vehicles travel the highway on average each day." Clarify whether it's the State Route or I-80, sentence structure is confusing there.
  • " only meeting SR 154 at an interchange" only is redundant here.... and how can a road "meet" another road? Maybe "connects with" is better? Correct me if I'm wrong with this.
  • SR 11 was designated around 1969 as a connector between Canfield and Austintown.[10][11] One of the citations is from 1967... clarify the year.
  • Try if you could see in a website like LexisNexis or Questa more about the history of this route, especially Ballbater's concern in the talk page, if you exhausted all your sources it's fine.
  • LexisNexis doesn't go back to the 1960s, and I don't have access to Questa.—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 17:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can you get the exact year of when it became a "limited access highway" without a map as a source?
  • The highway was slowly upgraded over the years...so I guess not.—CycloneIsaacE-Mail 19:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fix the year and date of Citation 24, it is not from 1984.
  • Be consistent with citation formats.
  • Be consistent with numbers under 10 " in these 3 miles" for example per WP:MOS
  • All images are free to use, no close paraphrasing concerns.
  • However I'm not sure if you used every available source for this article so I'm placing it on hold for now. Secret account 17:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok looks good to me passing. Secret account 20:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]