Talk:Ohio State Route 300/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 03:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The sentence "SR 300 heads due north through what is predominantly farmland, with the occasional clump of trees and house lining up alongside the highway" needs to be reworded.

This sentence has been re-worded. DanTheMan474 (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Woods dominate the landscape" sounds awkward.

The wording of this phrase has been updated. DanTheMan474 (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence "SR 300 made its debut in 1932." sounds awkward, try using a word other than "debut".

The wording has been changed to, "SR 300 was applied in 1932." DanTheMan474 (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Is there any more history for the road since 1937?
No. Sourcing indicates that SR 300 as it appeared in 1937 with respect to routing, paving, intersecting routes, etc. aligns with the highway as it appears today. DanTheMan474 (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
There are no available images pertaining to SR 300 at this time. DanTheMan474 (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few minor concerns. Dough 48 72 03:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough 48 72 15:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]