Talk:Ohio State Route 364/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cameron11598 (talk · contribs) 19:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claiming, will review later. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	"and became completely paved by 1940." - that part of the sentence is grammatically incorrect. "In Auglaize County, a gravel road from SR 219 to SR 32 was built by 1932," - this could probably be phrased better
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	no problems here --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Article is well sourced. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	no issues that I can see --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
	2c. it contains no original research.	No Original Research --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No Copy Right Violations detected --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	No issues here --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	No issues here --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Written with a WP:NPOV --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No edit wars, seems stable --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	image has correct license info. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	the image's caption could use some expanding. As it is the caption doesn't provide any context on why the image is relevant to the article. For reference I'm revering to "Grand Lake St. Marys State Park"--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
	7. Overall assessment.	all issues have been fixed so I'm going to pass this. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 20:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneIsaac: Only a few minor things to fix. Good work! --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 20:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cameron11598: All issues fixed.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 20:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]