Talk:Ontario Highway 21

Ontario Highway 21 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 25, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Canada Roads: Ontario Mid‑importance

This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Ontario

This article has a KML file.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 21/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 17:36, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):
b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Infobox[edit]

No issues

Lead[edit]

King's Highway 21, commonly referred to as Highway 21... → Isn't the title of the article "Ontario Highway 21"?
The title is based on a naming convention used for Canadian highways of [Province] (Highway/Route) # - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 01:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fix disambiguation issue with the word "whiteout" according to this
Highway 21 is often subject to winter closures due to lake effect caused snowsquall... → Add "by" between "caused" and "snowsquall"

Route description[edit]

The route is generally smoothly-flowing, but can be somewhat congested near main towns during the summer from tourists and cottagers. Highway 21 is often subject to closures at various points as it lies on the lee shore of Lake Huron. Lake effect snow squalls frequently subject motorists to poor visibility and slippery conditions, leading to whiteout conditions. Highway 23 provides an alternative inland route. → Original research?
Not original, but mostly sourced to a WP:SPS that is no good here. I'll see if I can dig something up to make this workable. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 01:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

No issues

Major intersections[edit]

This section of Highway 21 was downloaded in 1997/1998 → Downloaded?
The term is explained at its first appearance in the last paragraph of the history section. It is a common term, in Ontario at least, to describe when a higher government dumps the financial responsibility/liability for infrastructure or services onto a lower level of government.

References[edit]

No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 18:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor seems to have already addressed the grammatical issues (as well as attempting to address other issues seemingly without experience...). Give me a few days for the traffic and weather part. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 01:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Refs added, should be good to go. Thanks for the review! - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 15:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Keep up the good work you are doing! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 18:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]