Talk:OpenCms

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Change name proposal, the correct name of the project is, as they say in their website, OpenCms --HnZeKtO 30 June 2005 17:01 (UTC)

Is there really only one book published so far documenting this CMS? --

Needs updated[edit]

I think it is presumptuous to state that this is one of the most powerful CMS tools. This CMS is more like an aging dinosaur. It does not even support JSR-170 which competing tools such as Magnolia and JBoss Portal do. Both Magnolia and JBoss Portal have more features than OpenCMS and DotNetNuke has the most features by far of just about any CMS but none of these are described as "most powerful". The wikipedia should stick to facts, not opinion and conjecture that simply is a mouth-piece for a particular vendor.