Talk:OpenJ9

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Notability[edit]

A Google search for "j9 vm ibm" (without the quotes) returns about 980,000 results. The challenge is not in finding secondary sources as evidence of notability, but in sorting through the myriad pages noting it to select ones that would best enlighten the Wikipedia user.

Please do not consider this for deletion for lack of "notability". Bob Kerns (talk) 04:24, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Large update to the OpenJ9 page[edit]

I received some very helpful feedback from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pburka (thank you!) following my first contribution to Wikipedia. Although I had added what I thought to be a lot of useful information about OpenJ9 that was currently missing, and made some updates to existing content that was out-dated or misplaced, I had failed to add references that meet Wikipedia criteria. I have read through the suggested material about documenting sources and included a number of supporting references throughout. Hopefully these are acceptable and not considered to be "questionable sources" and this is sufficient for the current template message to be removed? Sue Chaplain (talk) 14:14, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Pburka (talk) 17:05, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]