Talk:Optimal decision

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notation for expected utility[edit]

Currently the article uses one piece of notation for two different things: means both utility and expected utility. It is standard in the optimization literature to denote expected utility as the expected value of utility: I fixed the notational inconsistency by inserting the expectations operator, but this fix was reverted by Winterfors without explanation. Can you explain why? Loraof (talk) 16:10, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits, I reverted this particular one because gives the impression of being an expectation over the space of possible decision , when the expectation is taken over the space of possible outcomes . I agree that including the expectation in the notation might be a good idea, but it needs to be clear on what variable it operates.Winterfors (talk) 18:23, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]